Generated April 15, 2025

A New Custom Metabolic Model for Iron-Oxidizing Bacteria

Authors: Gracee K. Tothero, Pamela Weisenhorn, Filipe Liu, José P. Faria, Christopher S. Henry, Clara S. Chan

Citation

When applying this workflow in your own research, please cite the associated Microbiology Resource Announcement: Insert full citation with link here

Table of Contents:

  1. Introduction
  2. Template Demonstration: Modeling and Analysis of Sideroxydans lithotrophicus ES-1
  3. Applications: Modeling and Analysis of a Leptothrix ochracea Metagenome-Assembled Genome
  4. Conclusions
  5. References and Other Resources

Introduction

In this tutorial narrative, we introduce a novel template developed to enable the creation of stoichiometric genome-scale metabolic models for iron-oxidizing bacteria. We demonstrate the development of this template by applying it to Sideroxydans lithotrophicus ES-1, and validate our model using transcriptomic data (Published in Zhou et al., 2022 AEM). Below, we further show that our template facilitates the modeling of mixotrophic iron-oxidizing bacteria and metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), by applying our template to the MAG of the mixotrophic iron oxidizer Leptothrix ochracea (Published in Tothero et al, 2024). This work represents the first instance of a generalized and adaptable template for modeling diverse iron-oxidizing microbial systems, expanding the accessibility and applicability of metabolic modeling in this field.

When is this workflow useful?

We recommend using this template with caution. These models should not be used to identify iron-oxidizing bacteria. Rather, they are useful for assessing whether iron oxidation can generate energy or biomass or for examining interconnected metabolic pathways in uncultured iron oxidizers. \ \ This template should ideally be used once the iron oxidation function has been verified. Using the default annotation by RASTtk is not sufficient given the current state of knowledge on iron-oxidizing genes. Some recommended methods of verification are:

  1. Determine if the organism is a member of a taxonomic group known to oxidize iron (e.g., Gallionellaceae, Zetaproteobacteria, Leptothrix).
  2. Culture the organism as an iron oxidizer.
  3. Identify the iron oxidase using multiple methods (e.g. FeGenie (Garber et al., 2020), METABOLIC-C (Zhou et al., 2022 Microbiome), HMMs, BLAST) and further analyze candidate iron oxidase genes to determine the level of confidence. For Cyc2 sequences, this involves insertion into a Cyc2 tree (McAllister et al., 2020) and determining which cluster it belongs to (1, 2, 3), as not all Cyc2 clusters have equal evidence for iron oxidation function (Keffer et al., 2021). For potential MtoA sequences, comparison to a functionally characterized iron oxidase MtoA_ES-1 and the iron reductase MtrA (Shewanella) is required. Further clues may be found in the gene neighborhoods. \ This template is based on the Cyc2 and MtoAB iron oxidation pathways from Acidithiobacillus ferrooxydans and Sideroxydans lithotrophicus (Castelle et al., 2008; Zhou et al., 2022 AEM; Zhou et al., 2022 ES&T). However, other validated iron oxidases may be used interchangeably with caution, in cases where the stoichiometry of the pathway remains the same for a 1 electron oxidation of Fe.

Data Requirements

This tutorial makes use of a genome nucleotide FASTA file and a Media formulation file. You may upload your own data or use the publicly available genomes and media accessible through the Public tab of the data browser. In the absence of a provided media formulation, MS2 will default to Auxotrophy Media. For more information on formatting and uploading data, see the Data Upload and Download Guide. For more information on adding data to your Narrative, please see the Narrative Interface User Guide.

We recommend checking the MS2 Tutorial - Build and gap-fill genome-scale metabolic models with ModelSEED2 and the Microbial Metabolic Model Reconstruction and Analysis Tutorial for additional in-depth tutorials that provide essential background on KBase's metabolic modeling functionality and the methods applied in this workflow.

Model Workflow

  • Step 1: Data Import
    • Import a Genome into the Narrative
    • Import Media into the Narrative
  • Step 2: Initial Model Reconstruction
    • Annotate a Genome with RAST-tk
    • Build a Draft Metabolic Model with MS2
  • Step 3: Model Curation and Verification
    • Edit Media
    • Gapfill Metabolic Model
    • Edit Metabolic Model
  • Step 4: Final Model Interpretation

Template Demonstration: Modeling and Analysis of Sideroxydans lithotrophicus ES-1

Scientific Background

Sideroxydans lithotrophicus ES-1 is a long-studied iron-oxidizing isolate capable of chemolithoautotrophic growth on varied substrates, including Fe(II), thiosulfate, magnetite, and smectite. Its metabolic flexibility and extensive physiological and transcriptomic data make this isolate ideal for model development and validation. This tutorial uses the genome of Sideroxydans lithotrophicus ES-1 that is available through RefSeq and transcriptome data published in Zhou et al., 2022 (AEM). We also use a media formulation for Modified Wolfe's Minimal Media (MWMM) with Fe(II) to correspond with the transcriptome data.

Import a Genome and Media into the Narrative

If you wish to use publicly-available data, both genome and media files can be accessed through the "Public" tab of the data browser.

If you wish to upload your own data, you may do so using the "Import" tab of the data browser:

  • Import a Genome from a FASTA File
    • In the data browser, select "Import" and upload the appropriate FASTA file for your genome of interest. This may be either a complete genome sequence or a metagenome-assembled genome.
    • In the staging area file list, select "FASTA Assembly," then import your selected genome using the Import from Staging Area app. Edit the assembly object name to reflect your genome name.
  • Import Media from a tsv file

    • In the data browser, select the appropriate tsv file containing your media formulation of interest.
    • In the staging area file list, select "Media" then import the media file using the Import Media File from Staging Area app. Edit the media object name to reflect your desired media name.
    • For more information on formatting your own media file, see How to format reaction media files

      In the absence of a provided media formulation, MS2 will default to Auxotrophy Media. For more information on formatting and uploading data, see the Data Upload and Download Guide. For more information on adding data to your Narrative, please see the Narrative Interface User Guide.

from biokbase.narrative.jobs.appmanager import AppManager
AppManager().run_app_batch(
    [{
        "app_id": "kb_uploadmethods/import_fasta_as_assembly_from_staging",
        "tag": "release",
        "version": "5b9346463df88a422ff5d4f4cba421679f63c73f",
        "params": [{
            "staging_file_subdir_path": "NC_013959.1_Sideroxydans lithotrophicus ES-1_complete sequence.fasta",
            "assembly_name": "Sideroxydans_lithotrophicus_ES-1"
        }],
        "shared_params": {
            "type": "draft isolate",
            "min_contig_length": 500
        }
    }],
    cell_id="114de465-72dd-4fde-948c-c823ba12921a",
    run_id="4468d3ad-3d7f-403f-809d-063e7871e27d"
)
Import a Media file (in TSV or Excel format) from your staging area into your Narrative
This app completed without errors in 40s.
Summary
Import Finished Media Object Name: MWMM_Fe_limiting Imported File: MWMM_Fe_limiting.tsv

Build a Draft Metabolic Model

  • Annotate the genome using RASTtk
    • Browse the annotated genome object created in the data tab
  • The narrative needs to use Beta apps. In the apps tab, click the "R" to switch to use Beta apps.
  • Select the app "MS2 - Build Prokaryotic Metabolic Models with OMEGGA"
    • Input your desired genome and media, then click "show advanced." Under "Media to ensure ATP production", select "Ironredox" to include the iron oxidation pathway in the model.
  • After running the model, browse the reconstruction report, FBAModel and FBA objects created to evaluate reaction fluxes, gene-protein-reaction connections, compound fluxes, objective values, etc.
Annotate or re-annotate genome/assembly using RASTtk (Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology toolkit).
This app completed without errors in 2m 6s.
Objects
Created Object Name Type Description
Sideroxydans_lithotrophicus_ES-1_RASTtk Genome RAST re-annotated genome
Summary
The RAST algorithm was applied to annotating an existing genome: Sideroxydans lithotrophicus ES-1. The sequence for this genome is comprised of 1 contigs containing 3003656 nucleotides. The input genome has 2975 existing coding features. and 119 existing non-coding features. Input genome has the following feature types: Non-coding gene 55 Non-coding ncRNA 3 Non-coding rRNA 6 Non-coding regulatory 9 Non-coding tRNA 45 Non-coding tmRNA 1 gene 2975 The genome features were functionally annotated using the following algorithm(s): Kmers V2; Kmers V1; protein similarity. In addition to the remaining original 2965 coding features and 119 non-coding features, 0 new features were called, of which 0 are non-coding. Output genome has the following feature types: Coding gene 2965 Non-coding gene 55 Non-coding ncRNA 3 Non-coding rRNA 6 Non-coding regulatory 9 Non-coding tRNA 45 Non-coding tmRNA 1 The number of distinct functions can exceed the number of genes because some genes have multiple functions.
Links
v1 - KBaseGenomes.Genome-11.1
The viewer for the data in this Cell is available at the original Narrative here: https://narrative.kbase.us/narrative/200793
Using ModelSEED2 pipeline, construct draft metabolic models based on input annotated genomes.
This app completed without errors in 8m 19s.
Objects
Links
The viewer for the data in this Cell is available at the original Narrative here: https://narrative.kbase.us/narrative/200793
The viewer for the data in this Cell is available at the original Narrative here: https://narrative.kbase.us/narrative/200793

Model Curation, Verification, and Interpretation

After browsing the model results (including the genome annotations, reactions that were included or gapfilled, objective value, and reaction fluxes), model curation may be useful to improve the accuracy of the modeling results. This may be done by using the Edit Media, Gapfill Metabolic Model, or Edit Metabolic Model functions in KBase.

Compare Flux with Expression

  • To evaluate the model predictions, we used the expression dataset from Zhou et al., 2022 (AEM) to compare the flux balance analysis results to transcriptome data in culture on the same media. To ensure a meaningful comparison between reaction fluxes predicted by the stoichiometric metabolic model and gene expression data, mid-logarithmic phase expression data was selected. During this phase, cells are in a state of balanced growth, where metabolic processes are operating to maximize biomass production. This alignment between model assumptions and biological conditions minimizes the confounding effects of nutrient depletion and stress responses typically observed in late-log and stationary phases.
  • We downloaded the FBAModel data object (tsv) and merged it with expression data using the feature IDs assigned during RAST annotation. Feature IDs and aliases were used to match locus tags used in the expression data to gene IDs used in the FBAModel. Gene expression data (TPM) was averaged across triplicates, and in cases where multiple genes were mapped to a single model reaction, the expression of all genes were averaged. We validated that all reactions that had flux in the FBAModel were associated with a gene that was expressed, except those that were gapfilled, and the majority of genes with high flux in the model were expressed at high to moderate levels.

Applications: Modeling and Analysis of a Leptothrix ochracea Metagenome-Assembled Genome

Scientific Background

Leptothrix ochracea is a conspicuous sheath-forming iron oxidizer which grows prolifically as iron microbial mats in freshwater environments. It has famously evaded isolation, and near-complete genomes have only recently been reconstructed. Its genomic potential and transcriptomes suggest that it thrives by growing mixotrophically, using Fe(II) as an energy source alongside organics (Tothero et al., 2024). However, the lack of culturing-based physiological data to confirm this activity makes L. ochracea an ideal candidate for investigation through metabolic models to explore its potential behavior in an iron-oxidizing context.This tutorial uses a metagenome-assembled genome of L. ochracea that is available through RefSeq and published in Tothero et al., 2024.

Import a Genome and Media into the Narrative

This use case produces metabolic models using multiple media formulations. We will use the Modified Wolfe's Mineral Media with Fe(II) as done above, but we will also demonstrate that this template can be used to model growth on minimal media containing organic carbon (Lactate) for mixotrophic iron-oxidizing bacteria. Therefore, the lactate minimal media will be uploaded in this section.

from biokbase.narrative.jobs.appmanager import AppManager
AppManager().run_app_batch(
    [{
        "app_id": "kb_uploadmethods/import_fasta_as_assembly_from_staging",
        "tag": "release",
        "version": "5b9346463df88a422ff5d4f4cba421679f63c73f",
        "params": [{
            "staging_file_subdir_path": "Leptothrix_ochracea_DE1.021_GCF_041083635.1.fna",
            "assembly_name": "Leptothrix_ochracea_DE1.021_GCF_041083635.1"
        }],
        "shared_params": {
            "type": "draft isolate",
            "min_contig_length": 500
        }
    }],
    cell_id="1afbddc8-dc23-4a3e-99da-b6153f0c29db",
    run_id="c3b7a731-844d-4389-ba2d-1316e5852229"
)
Import a Media file (in TSV or Excel format) from your staging area into your Narrative
This app completed without errors in 27s.
Summary
Import Finished Media Object Name: Lactate_minimal_media Imported File: Lactate_minimal_media.tsv

Build a Draft Metabolic Model

Annotate or re-annotate genome/assembly using RASTtk (Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology toolkit).
This app completed without errors in 2m 51s.
Objects
Created Object Name Type Description
Leptothrix_ochracea_RASTtk Genome RAST re-annotated genome
Summary
The RAST algorithm was applied to annotating a genome sequence comprised of 50 contigs containing 2957507 nucleotides. No initial gene calls were provided. Standard features were called using: glimmer3; prodigal. A scan was conducted for the following additional feature types: rRNA; tRNA; selenoproteins; pyrrolysoproteins; repeat regions; crispr. The genome features were functionally annotated using the following algorithm(s): Kmers V2; Kmers V1; protein similarity. In addition to the remaining original 0 coding features and 0 non-coding features, 2986 new features were called, of which 284 are non-coding. Output genome has the following feature types: Coding gene 2702 Non-coding crispr_array 3 Non-coding crispr_repeat 71 Non-coding crispr_spacer 68 Non-coding repeat 102 Non-coding rna 40 The number of distinct functions can exceed the number of genes because some genes have multiple functions.
Links
v1 - KBaseGenomes.Genome-11.1
The viewer for the data in this Cell is available at the original Narrative here: https://narrative.kbase.us/narrative/200793

Although we know that Leptothrix ochracea thrives as a mixotroph, we can test the modeling template using the autotrophic media MWMM with Fe.

Using ModelSEED2 pipeline, construct draft metabolic models based on input annotated genomes.
This app completed without errors in 9m 14s.
Objects
Created Object Name Type Description
Leptothrix_ochracea_RASTtkMWMM.mdl FBAModel
Leptothrix_ochracea_RASTtkMWMM.mdl.fba FBA
Links
v1 - KBaseFBA.FBAModel-15.0
The viewer for the data in this Cell is available at the original Narrative here: https://narrative.kbase.us/narrative/200793
The viewer for the data in this Cell is available at the original Narrative here: https://narrative.kbase.us/narrative/200793

To identify whether Leptothrix ochracea can produce biomass by growing mixotrophically, we can provide minimal media with a single carbon source and Fe(II)

Using ModelSEED2 pipeline, construct draft metabolic models based on input annotated genomes.
This app completed without errors in 8m 55s.
Objects
Created Object Name Type Description
Leptothrix_ochracea_RASTtklactate.mdl FBAModel
Leptothrix_ochracea_RASTtklactate.mdl.fba FBA
Links
v1 - KBaseFBA.FBAModel-15.0
The viewer for the data in this Cell is available at the original Narrative here: https://narrative.kbase.us/narrative/200793
The viewer for the data in this Cell is available at the original Narrative here: https://narrative.kbase.us/narrative/200793

Final Model Interpretation

This method was used to model L. ochracea growth on nine organic carbon substrates in minimal media, with and without iron oxidation (Tothero et al., 2024). The objective value of these models demonstrated growth via mixotrophic iron oxidation; that is, L. ochracea produced biomass while oxidizing both iron and organic carbon. This offered quantitative support for the proposed metabolism of L. ochracea, strengthening the metagenomic and metatranscriptomic evidence for mixotrophy. These results reinforce the 'omics-based findings, highlighting the value of metabolic modeling in predicting metabolic strategies.

Conclusions

This tutorial has demonstrated a complete workflow for constructing, curating, and validating a stoichiometric metabolic model of iron-oxidizing bacteria using KBase. By developing and applying the template to the reference organism isolate, we have shown how expression data can validate model predictions and highlight the reliability of the approach. The subsequent use case for an uncultured iron oxidizer illustrates the template's versatility in exploring metabolic pathways when physiological data are lacking. This workflow, from data import to final model presentation, provides a robust framework for investigating energy metabolism and biomass production in iron-oxidizing bacteria, supporting research on both cultivated and uncultivated organisms.

References and Other Resources

  • Castelle, C., Guiral, M., Malarte, G., Ledgham, F., Leroy, G., Brugna, M., & Giudici-Orticoni, M.-T. (2008). A New Iron-oxidizing/O2-reducing Supercomplex Spanning Both Inner and Outer Membranes, Isolated from the Extreme Acidophile Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. In Journal of Biological Chemistry (Vol. 283, Issue 38, pp. 25803–25811). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m802496200.
  • Faria, J. P., Liu, F., Edirisinghe, J. N., Gupta, N., Seaver, S. M. D., Freiburger, A. P., Zhang, Q., Weisenhorn, P., Conrad, N., Zarecki, R., Song, H.-S., DeJongh, M., Best, A. A., Cottingham, R. W., Arkin, A. P., & Henry, C. S. (2023). ModelSEED v2: High-throughput genome-scale metabolic model reconstruction with enhanced energy biosynthesis pathway prediction. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.04.556561.
  • Garber, A. I., Nealson, K. H., Okamoto, A., McAllister, S. M., Chan, C. S., Barco, R. A., & Merino, N. (2020). FeGenie: A Comprehensive Tool for the Identification of Iron Genes and Iron Gene Neighborhoods in Genome and Metagenome Assemblies. In Frontiers in Microbiology (Vol. 11). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00037.
  • Keffer, J. L., McAllister, S. M., Garber, A. I., Hallahan, B. J., Sutherland, M. C., Rozovsky, S., & Chan, C. S. (2021). Iron Oxidation by a Fused Cytochrome-Porin Common to Diverse Iron-Oxidizing Bacteria. In A. Komeili (Ed.), mBio (Vol. 12, Issue 4). American Society for Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.01074-21
  • McAllister, S. M., Polson, S. W., Butterfield, D. A., Glazer, B. T., Sylvan, J. B., & Chan, C. S. (2020). Validating the Cyc2 Neutrophilic Iron Oxidation Pathway Using Meta-omics of Zetaproteobacteria Iron Mats at Marine Hydrothermal Vents. In K. G. Lloyd (Ed.), mSystems (Vol. 5, Issue 1). American Society for Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00553-19.
  • Tothero, G. K., Hoover, R. L., Farag, I. F., Kaplan, D. I., Weisenhorn, P., Emerson, D., & Chan, C. S. (2024). Leptothrix ochracea genomes reveal potential for mixotrophic growth on Fe(II) and organic carbon. In A. Bose (Ed.), Applied and Environmental Microbiology (Vol. 90, Issue 9). American Society for Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00599-24.
  • Zhou, N., Keffer, J. L., Polson, S. W., & Chan, C. S. (2022). Unraveling Fe(II)-Oxidizing Mechanisms in a Facultative Fe(II) Oxidizer, Sideroxydans lithotrophicus Strain ES-1, via Culturing, Transcriptomics, and Reverse Transcription-Quantitative PCR. In N. R. Buan (Ed.), Applied and Environmental Microbiology (Vol. 88, Issue 2). American Society for Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01595-21.
  • Zhou, N., Kupper, R. J., Catalano, J. G., Thompson, A., & Chan, C. S. (2022). Biological Oxidation of Fe(II)-Bearing Smectite by Microaerophilic Iron Oxidizer Sideroxydans lithotrophicus Using Dual Mto and Cyc2 Iron Oxidation Pathways. In Environmental Science & Technology (Vol. 56, Issue 23, pp. 17443–17453). American Chemical Society (ACS). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c05142.
  • Zhou, Z., Tran, P. Q., Breister, A. M., Liu, Y., Kieft, K., Cowley, E. S., Karaoz, U., & Anantharaman, K. (2022). METABOLIC: high-throughput profiling of microbial genomes for functional traits, metabolism, biogeochemistry, and community-scale functional networks. In Microbiome (Vol. 10, Issue 1). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01213-8

See Also

Released Apps

  1. Annotate Genome/Assembly with RASTtk - v1.073
    • [1] Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, et al. The RAST Server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9: 75. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-75
    • [2] Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42: D206 D214. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1226
    • [3] Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Olsen GJ, et al. RASTtk: A modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep. 2015;5. doi:10.1038/srep08365
    • [4] Kent WJ. BLAT The BLAST-Like Alignment Tool. Genome Res. 2002;12: 656 664. doi:10.1101/gr.229202
    • [5] Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25: 3389-3402. doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389
    • [6] Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25: 955 964.
    • [7] Cobucci-Ponzano B, Rossi M, Moracci M. Translational recoding in archaea. Extremophiles. 2012;16: 793 803. doi:10.1007/s00792-012-0482-8
    • [8] Meyer F, Overbeek R, Rodriguez A. FIGfams: yet another set of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37 6643-54. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp698.
    • [9] van Belkum A, Sluijuter M, de Groot R, Verbrugh H, Hermans PW. Novel BOX repeat PCR assay for high-resolution typing of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34: 1176 1179.
    • [10] Croucher NJ, Vernikos GS, Parkhill J, Bentley SD. Identification, variation and transcription of pneumococcal repeat sequences. BMC Genomics. 2011;12: 120. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-12-120
    • [11] Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11: 119. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-119
    • [12] Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics. 2007;23: 673 679. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009
    • [13] Akhter S, Aziz RK, Edwards RA. PhiSpy: a novel algorithm for finding prophages in bacterial genomes that combines similarity- and composition-based strategies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40: e126. doi:10.1093/nar/gks406
  2. Import Media file (TSV/Excel) from Staging Area
    no citations

Apps in Beta

  1. Import Media file (TSV/Excel) from Staging Area
    no citations
  2. MS2 - Build Prokaryotic Metabolic Models with OMEGGA
    • [1] Henry CS, DeJongh M, Best AA, Frybarger PM, Linsay B, Stevens RL. High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28: 977 982. doi:10.1038/nbt.1672
    • [2] Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42: D206 D214. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1226
    • [3] Latendresse M. Efficiently gap-filling reaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15: 225. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-15-225
    • [4] Dreyfuss JM, Zucker JD, Hood HM, Ocasio LR, Sachs MS, Galagan JE. Reconstruction and Validation of a Genome-Scale Metabolic Model for the Filamentous Fungus Neurospora crassa Using FARM. PLOS Computational Biology. 2013;9: e1003126. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003126
    • [5] Mahadevan R, Schilling CH. The effects of alternate optimal solutions in constraint-based genome-scale metabolic models. Metab Eng. 2003;5: 264 276.